Cinco Vidas quote Cinco Vidas quote Cinco Vidas quote Cinco Vidas quote Cinco Vidas quote Cinco Vidas quote
5 Pillars of Cinco Vidas - Beauty, Hope, Purpose, Safety, Health & Wellness

Cinco Vidas Blog

by author, natural beauty expert & cancer survivor Britta AragonRSS



Toxin Alert: Triclosan—“Antibacterial” Not as Protective as You Think

By Britta Aragon on August 9, 2009 | 8 Comments

Super bugs—those resistant to common antibiotics—have become a serious concern over the last decade. “When antibiotics are used for non-bacterial illnesses, or when prescriptions are not taken for the full cycle, the bugs that endure pass on their drug-resistant traits to subsequent generations,” says livescience.com.

Faced with the possibility that our current arsenal of antibiotics may not always defeat disease, we’ve become even more concerned about avoiding germs. The recent swine flu epidemic hasn’t helped. We all know hand washing is key to avoiding infection, so we wash often, and not just with warm water and soap—with antibacterial soap. We believe the “antibacterial” will better protect us against the germs, but what science is discovering is not only do antibacterials give us a false sense of security, but they’re polluting our environment and may have a superbug backlash of their own.

Most soaps that boast germ-killing powers (about 75%) contain “triclosan,” an ingredient that kills bacteria, but has no effect on viruses. Since most common illnesses like colds and flus are caused by viruses, antibacterial ingredients don’t prevent them, so we’re not really protected as much as we may think. In fact, an advisory panel of the FDA reported in 2005 that there was no evidence that antibacterial products protected people any better than regular soap. A subsequent study from the University of Michigan agreed.

Triclosan is also causing a lot of concern for personal and environmental health. It’s chemical structure is remarkably similar to dioxin—a class of super-toxic carcinogenic chemicals formed as by-products of the manufacture of chlorine-containing products. This similarity could lead to contamination of triclosan with dioxins, according to the Washington Toxics Coalition. A recent study already found that when triclosan was exposed to ultraviolet light, a type of dioxin formed. Besides the dioxin fear, triclosan has already found its way into human breast milk and urine, and has shown to be an endocrine disruptor in tests on animal and human cells.

Environmentally, triclosan and triclocarban (an ingredient in antibacterial bar soaps, deodorants, and toothpaste) is already accumulating in soil. According to Johns Hopkins research, about 75% of these chemicals that are flushed down our drains survive treatment at sewage plants and end up as sludge spread onto farm fields. Most of these fields do not produce food crops, but the debate as to the safety of this practice continues. “The bottom line,” says Rolf Halden, assistant professor at John’s Hopkins’ Department of Environmental Health Sciences, “is that we’re mass-producing chemicals in the environment that are not helpful and potentially are harmful.”

Antibacterial soaps contain other harsh chemicals as well, like alcohol, “quats” (which can cause skin or eye burns), and phenylphenols, which are possible carcinogens. And the fact that we’re using them so much could also lead to new superbugs. “Many public-health professionals fear that too much use of antimicrobials, especially in the uncontrolled home environment, may result in germs resistant to these chemicals,” says the Washington Toxics Coalition. “Triclosan is thought  to cause a similar resistance to develop because…its use is becoming so widespread.” Do we really need to be exposing ourselves—and our environment—to all these chemicals when natural soap and hot water do just as well?

“Manufacturers of products containing triclosan and triclocarban should consider providing cautionary labels,” says Dan Chang, professor emeritus of civil and environmental engineering at UC Davis. “There are new health-related data on these chemicals that consumers should know about, even if the research is in its early stages,” Chang said.

There are lots of options out there for hand soaps. Look for “organic” and “natural” on labels, and try brands like Weleda, Tom’s of Maine, and Saffron Rouge. For a great alcohol and triclosan-free hand sanitizer, try Clean Well, which is proven to kill 99% of germs naturally.

Have you made the switch to non-anti-bacterial products? Please share your experiences.

Photo courtesy of serenitypno via Flickr.com.

Posted in: Skin, Lip and Body Care, Toxic Talk and Labels


8 Comments to “Toxin Alert: Triclosan—“Antibacterial” Not as Protective as You Think”

  1. Well writen article. Various companies are now marketing products that claim they kill antibiotic resistant bacteria and virus. Unfortunatly these products kill good germs and allow colonisation of bad bugs.

    In India, hospitals are still using 70% alcohol and in UK the nurses think quick squirt of alcohol gel on their hand makes their hand sterile. Please make sure they wash their hands using soap and water. Alcohol gel may be used in emergency situation and when water and soap is not available.

    Excessive use of detergent, shampoo and chemicals used in toilet and kitchen have killed good germs in the sewer and now the rivers are said to be colonised with resistant strain. Excessive use of chemicals to clean hospitals in UK have made hospitals a no go area. When you take your kids to hospitals please make sure they don’t run around and touch any equipment or computers.

    This is depressing but don’t get paranoid. We know there are bad bugs in the community, only thing you can do is make sure they don’t enter your body.

  2. Kathy Dolan says:

    Thank you for spreading the truth about toxic triclosan. Food & Water Watch is working to ban the non-medical uses of triclosan.

    If any readers in the DC area are interested in trading in triclosan containing products, Food & Water Watch will safely dispose of them! Just come to the P St. Whole Foods Market on Saturday September 12, 2009! To learn more: http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/t/5915/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1866

  3. liz says:

    hey thks for writing this, i really appreciate this especially for people who would like to protect their love ones and friends from all harm…
    well one thing’s for sure…marketers ususally mass market anything on the demand list(public wouldn’t know if they’re harmful right? they ususally just consume.)So Triclosan here is a prominent case. Marketers ususally focus on making sales. Why would they care about people’s welfare when they’re doing their job and earning a lot of money from it?(which many org aim to do).
    Then u may say why must they include these harmful ingredients? aren’t there any subs? or some reason? likewise there is a demand of a product that people dont know is harmful but the manufacturers or someone in that company should know and may not be saying…because maybe there are no other subs? without which they would lose potential sales…maybe? i dont know…

    Other similar cases such as non-comedogenic creams which many acne victims like to look out for.
    Well, it was like this i saw a cream labelled non-com however to my horror i looked at the ingredients and saw Glyceryl Stearate SE (com lvl 3) and acne sufferers should not use more than 2…
    Oh yes, another personal experience, i bought a couple of face masks i can’t remember what flavours they are from the face shop, that aim to reduce appearance of pimples to clear up…but i saw this ingredient algae extract and wtf!? its com levl 5.
    I think it’s time for consumers to take responsiblity and be informed and fully aware of what they are specifically buying and not let marketers “cheat” you! *no offence*
    Well but that’s why people always say this doesn’t work! when the product offered otherwise…

  4. Marti says:

    This is an excellent article! Thanks for your thorough analysis. I saw a demonstration years ago proving that a good handwashing with regular soap was just as effective as using antibacterials.

    thirteen years ago, I found a company that offers safe, non-toxic products that are very effective. Everyone should do their own due diligence if they want safe products. They are out there.

  5. Britta says:

    Thank you for commenting Dr. Srivatsa and I am glad that you enjoyed the post. This is a very serious issue that needs more attention in our “too clean” society. Thank you for continuing the message. Best, Britta

  6. Britta says:

    Hi Kathy, Thank you so much for sharing this resource with my readers and thank you for commenting. I hope that event was a success! – Britta

  7. Britta says:

    Thanks Liz for the great comment! I agree that all of the products that are marketed to the masses take no regard to human health or safety. It is important for us to be educated and demand safe alternatives to conventional items on the shelf today. Keep spreading the word! – Britta

  8. Britta says:

    Yes Marti, I agree that everyone should do their own due diligence and stay informed about the products they use. Thanks so much for being an avid reader! – Britta


Leave a Reply




WIN MY BOOK

Win my book!

"Like" CV fan page on facebook for a chance to win When Cancer Hits

Become A Fan Now

WHAT'S YOUR SKIN CONDITION?

What's your skin condition?

Select from the list below:

CV Resource Center

Find a spa

Find Wig Salons, Organic Spas, Oncology Estheticians, Alternative Therapy Clinics in your area. Click here